@MatchaToad the banning according to Sane's own rules is a "last resort" however I was absolutely banned, and although you are meant to be given "warnings" - one post of mine apparantly did 3 bad things, so there were no "warnings" - which I think is a bit unfair. It is very traumatic to be banned, and I thought fairly unnecessary, and at that point I didn't really want to come back. I felt humiliated and harrassed.
But having spoken to the HCC, I feel like Sane is outside of a regulatory body - HCC can't really regulate them, nor can MHWC, so we have a quite interesting situation here, where Sane is regulating itself. Of course they don't want to respond to complaints.
I think perhaps, since Sane receives chartiable donations, I would be speaking more up to bodies that support Sane charitably, or Disability organisations, but ideally all mental health services should have a regulatory body and complaint pathway. Some of the things that happen at Sane should not happen.
In regards to the questions asked here, regarding how the forums are moderated or peer support input, thats a good question.
If Sane advertises 24/7 moderation, they can't really if there are no moderators. But who's going to speak up ? And to where? And who's going to be punished? me? again? why?