Yes,,,, I know something about it @tyme..... I do not think it was well thought out at all..... It sounds like a good thing the way it is portrayed by government and by media especially.. It sounds like it's a good thing,,,, until you think about it properly and with knowledge of CSA statistics and behaviours..... I know I have to be careful not to get too worked up about it here. It is a bit of a divisive topic for many people..
Because unfortunately most people who have been subject to CSA are not eligible..
For most people in Australia, and in fact in the whole world, who have been subject to CSA it did not occur in institutions. It happened in their own homes or homes of relatives or friends of family.
So we now have two levels of people who have been subject to CSA, those who deserve compensation and those who do not. This can be very distressing for many people because they can think they are not worth compensation, which is patently not true, but the government are kind of saying that.
.
So I am angry for the people who have not been abused in institutions. I will not be eligible for compensation for the most horrific, frequent and long term (many years) abuse (that happened in my own household.
.
Sorry, I know I am getting on a soap box.
A good place for people to find out information is Blue Knot Foundation. 1800 Respect should be able to provide some information. As should local sexual assault centres. There is a website devoted to it if you google National Redress Scheme. It is not a straightforward process and you need to be prepared that you may not get compensation or it may be less than you think is reasonable, you may also get some counseling.
Sorry this has made me very upset, I should not have given such a detailed answer, because then I wouldn't have had to think about it.
I know @RachSANECEO was saying the area of CSA was one she wanted to get more involved in, but I do not know what is happening there.
Sorry long post