@Sahara:
“Can I ask if she was personally reccommended to you by your doctor or by someone else? Does she belong to registered professional body for psychologists? Are you sure she is legitimate?”
She wasn’t specifically reccommended by anyone per se. The shrink I’d been seeing at the time (who was useless, but nowhere near as dammaging) told me to also go see a psychologist, but there was no-one specifically reccommended. I called up a clinic I’d found in the yellow pages (if memory serves), not knowing who worked there. It was a complicated time, so I probably didn’t do as much research as I should’ve. Had I known she was one of the staff there, I would’ve looked elsewhere.
As far as I know, she’s fully professional and qualified and diplomaed, ect, ect, ect. I believe that she’s reasonably well-regarded within the therapist community. I’ve even seen her giving “expert commentary” in some news segments on some of the major chanels’ news shows.
“From what I am hearing form others, dodgy psychologists do exist and they can be very damaging.”
I, too, have discovered in recent years that this is a disturbingly widespread phenomenon. A few years back, I visited some other mental-health forum - I forget the URL - where they had a dedicated sub-forum for people who wanted to complain about crappy therapists. The sub forum went of for pages and pages and pages. Just tons of people who had been screwed over by a mental health system that didn’t care, and wasn’t very interested in addressing the damage done to a bunch of undesirables, who for the most part were “fruitcakes” to begin with.
“You know, that's really odd that your psychologist described women as being like prostitutes or gold-diggers, when she, herself, is a woman!”
Sorry, I should’ve been more clear about this. She never used the words “prostitute” or “gold-digger”, but she told me numerous times that no woman would be interested in me if I didn’t have enough money. So if women will only engage in an “intimate” relationship with me for money, doesn’t that by definition make them prostitutes/gold-diggers?
“Would you be willing to begin therapy with a new psychologist? How long did you see the one you describe?”
7 years. And after that nightmare, no I wouldn’t be willing to walk into that trap ever again. Especially, as I’ve recently discovered, that there’s no actual willingness from the profession to provide actual help to people who need it.
“It's still up to you to make your own choices; no-one can live your life for you!”
But isn’t this really hippocrytical? I mean the very reason we remain alive is because ending it would be offensive/distressing to our community. We live because we have a moral duty to minimize the anguish we inflict on others. How can we be expected to be good people if the ones around us won’t tell us what they want us to do? And on a somewhat more selfish level, how can we achieve an amicable system of favor-trading with our community if they won’t tell us what we need to do to please them and thereby earn an entitlement of assistance from them?
Conversely, if our lives are our own, then why aren’t we free to leave it whenever we want to? Why do we expect suicidal people care more about averting their family’s agony then putting an end to their own?
If your life is yours then shouldn’t you be morally be free to conclude it at your discretion? If it’s your society’s then shouldn’t there be a clarification about what they want from you?
I can’t see how they can have it both ways.
“So a therapist can not exactly tell you what to do.”
Well, where does that leave people who have no clue what to do? Especially those who find themselves stuck in no-win situations? It’s the mental health industry (among others) that emphatically declares that is absolutely wrong for these people to simply stop playing the game. How come they get to bail out of the discussion without explaining to anyone what’s right?
“like joining a social group for singles, for example”
*Now* we’re getting somewhere! Which, to begin with, begs the question “how does one get invited in to a social group for singles?” and equally importantly, how can we refine the process so that we only get invited to join singles’ groups whose values are in-line with our own?
The peril lingering here, which I know all too well, is that if you wind up drawn in to the wrong crowd, the consequences can be devastating; harmful to all concerned.
This is where the role of a therapist as a medical professional really ought to come in to play, because when you have a situation where a patient has a dud lung, the doctors do all their scans and examinations to make sure that the replacement lung their gonna stick in the patient is compatible with the patient. They actually take an interest in making sure they don’t make a patient’s already dodgy health any worse by inserting an incompatible organ in them - which would be tantamount to poisoning them with foreign tissue.
Psychology should be no different. There should be a system where people who need a social circle should be examined, but not judged, to determine what their values and needs are and then be united with a group known to share such values and cater to such needs. And if therapists aren’t interested in providing such a service, they ought to be able to direct their patients to someone who is. And if nobody is interested in offering such a service, then the industry as a whole should stop promising the lost and confused that there is “help” available out there for them. Because the system as is (reverting to my previous dud lung metaphor), is like having a doctor hand his patient a scalpel and saying “Go find a dead body and try putting one of it’s lungs in your chest. Nice to see you. Goodbye.” That’s not help. It’s indifferance.