Hi @CheerBear @mudsum @Maggie @NikNik @Former-Member (and anyone I forgot). 
@CheerBear I totally agree with you re. the DSM. I think a good opportunity was lost when the DSM-V was published. Hopefully by the time the next edition comes out, the world of mental health will have moved more towards a trauma-based conceptualisation of mental health issues.
I'm glad you are taking care of yourself by taking a break from TBKTS for now @CheerBear. I am going to keep pressing on - though maybe not at a particularly rapid rate!
I finally got through chapter 15. I found this chapter less confronting than the previous one. It is all about EMDR. I have done a bit of EMDR in the past but not in a particularly well-planned way (my previous psychologist, "Fred" learnt about it during our time together and we experimented with it a bit).
I would definitely be open to trying EMDR again. Although...according to Van Der Kolk (2014, p. 255) it doesn't work nearly as well for complex trauma arising from childhood events as it does for discreet traumatic events that occur in adulthood. He says that chronic childhood abuse causes very different mental and biological adaptations than discrete traumatic events in adulthood.
One thing I found interesting (and somewhat amusing) in this chapter is that when describing a study that included a placebo group, anti-depressant group, and EMDR group, Van Der Kolk (2014, p. 254) says that as often happens, the people on placebo did well. After eight weeks their 42 percent improvement [in PTSD symptomatology] was greater than that for many other treatments that are promoted as "evidence based." As a profession, psychology loves to see itself as very scientific and "evidence based". However, given that very few people know how to read the results section of a research paper, most people wouldn't know how flimsy a lot of that "evidence" actually is.
Van Der Kolk also made the point that in contrast to the effects of the placebo and the anti-depressant, the effects of EMDR persisted over time. Although participants taking the antidepressant got some positive effect (as compared to the placebo), this effect only lasted for as long as they were taking the medication. Thus, whereas the medication dampened down the PTSD symptomatology, EMDR actually CURED it. And thus, once again, we come back to the idea that the effects of trauma ARE curable. People DON'T have to settle for simply learning "coping skills" and spending a lifetime on medication. Sigh...
The final point I found interesting was that Van Der Kolk (2014, p. 256) argues that while exposure therapy can help people become less reactive to triggers over time, as far as we know, simply exposing someone to the old trauma does not integrate the memory into the overall context of their lives, and it rarely restores them to the level of joyful engagement with people and pursuits they had prior to the trauma. That's what I want! I want "the level of joyful engagement with people and pursuits" that I had prior to my muddle beginning. I understand from what Van Der Kolk says in this chapter that achieving that with respect to complex trauma rather than a discrete event is very difficult. However, difficult does not mean impossible. I KNOW my brain is fixable. I just need to somehow (and right now I have no idea how) find the right person to help me fix it.
Well that's my thoughts for this chapter. I look forward to hearing what others have to say...and if everyone decides to take a break from reading, well then you will just have to put up with me chattering along to myself. 