I must have just missed getting your reply @Chasingsunsets lol. I had thought maybe you were too tired after reading/supporting it and needed to sleep and respond later 😅 (which would have been totally OK and reasonable). I closed off forum a bit before going to sleep and instead read DSP claim guide which is much more encouraging 😅. And I know DSP is still hard to get too! Where as i may tick all the boxes for NDIS eligibility but then possibly denied supports because they are ongoing needs and wont "improve my capacity, thus requiring less supports over time" -- they just maintain my ability and prevent decline/incapacity in other areas too. But i expect an experienced doctor/aid may know how to frame things to put it within the perspective needed for ndis to understand that it is essential even if functional capacity will not improve over time from where i am at currently. After all - isnt pne of the requirements to be "stabilised" and permanent??? I just don't see how it squares with someone having stabilised and permanent disability but somehow also has the capacity to improve independence over time with supports/training -- to me that is not congruent "all treatments exhausted" in proving disability permanance. And goal-setting being something needed for NDIS plans (but i know the LAC can do this with me, so i'm not "worried" about it) - but i suspect "maintain a lower stress, less exhausting life so that I don't constantly want to die" is not going to be deemed a suitable goal. I know, i know, its a matter of breaking that down e.g. not being physically exhausted - ergo cleaning supports. But the examples i see are all around improving independence or learning new behaviours over time in order to reduce support needs. And i've already done that to the highest possible level - i have as many functional skills as i can really, to the point i am burnt out from the effort of using them constantly without relief.
Sorry for the semi-rant. I also know the financial pressure on the system. It also really annoyed me reading the parts about what is deemed "provided through the health system" rather than NDIS -- even though the government does not proivde funding for those things (eg non-pbs medication related to the disability, or longterm mental health support other than unlimited psychiatry or GP rebates which cover less than half the fee charged). Providing funding for access to treatments not covered by the government public health system to support a permanent disability is not deemed suitable for "disability insurance", its just does not make sense. Like somehow a health disability is less valid or suitable for requiring adequate support in order to life a meaningful and accessible life. Its all one government that ultimately pays for ndis or medicare healthcare -- it would make so much for sense for them to "internally charge" between their internal budgets for the healthcare-related NDIS supports if they feel its better funded through the health system. Oh wait, of course they dont want to do that - because then they'd have to PAY for these health supports that arent fully covered under the health system. So yes, it is just a way for the government to avoid paying for healthcare for longterm medical disability.
I'm grateful that the ndis does exist. I'm pragmatic - some assitance to people is better than none. But some of these rules are ... so unfair when seen in the scheme of the whole integrated system and "passing the buck".
The one positive thing with a psychiatrist is that there is no limit on how many sessions you can claim. And once you reach the safety net threshold for medicare-rebatable services you then get most of the out of pocket expense back too. When i saw a pdoc weekly in the the past (over 10 years ago), i think it cost about $350 per 50min consult, and i think it was about $200 out of pocket each time. Back then the safety net threshold for me was about $2k i think (maybe $1.5k?) so it was mid-March each year when i would reach it. So for the rest of the calendar year I was only paying $20 out of pocket per visit because of the 80% gap fee rebate from medicare after reaching the safety net. Much more affordable! But seriously that first $2k was a big barrier! Especially during the year that i was on centrelink payments. I had to get a creditcard so that i could pay the service fee whilst waiting for my rebate to come 3 days later.
It does sound unusual that your pdoc is keep you on reguarly if the condition is otherwise treated/supported adequately by another provider (eg psychologist) and the medication is stabilised and able to be monitored and prescribed by the GP - and just refer back for consult/review if there are changes or concerns.
Having said that, when i used to work for a psychiatrist we did have a number of patients who would attend every 3 months for medication review/monitoring alongside the required blood-tests. I dont know why the patients were not discharged to a GP for this ongoing (or maybe they were usually?), but perhaps it was only the less stable ones that were kept on and/or the ones who had health/pension concession cards (because the doc actually bulkbilled people with health concession or pension cards!!) and so financial impact was not then a barrier.
I reckon it would be a reasonable question to raise with the pdoc if you wanted to. Let them know the cost is difficult and a GP would be more affordable. Ask them if there are any concerns/barriers for them in passing routine prescribing to the GP. And maybe even discuss whether a yearly review in the absense of any changes/concerns would be suitable? 🤔
Always your choice 😊 but i think your concerns are absolutely reasonable!!
The MH GP is really understanding and easy to talk to. I feel i can be honest with her, even to the point of admitting that i don't know how she can help other than by providing referrals, opinions and medical evidence to support applications. It sounds so stupid in my head to admit that "here I am at the GP, but i don't even know what you can do to help". But i tell myself that its OK to not know and its ok for them to be the ones to suggest things. And it was really good that they brought up the autism aspect without me indicating anything around my own recognition of autistic traits - that was validating and having an experienced external perspective to support seeking a diagnosis in order to bolster applications for supports.
I will see her again in a month, as it is the soonest we are both available.
I have weekly 1hr massage to keep my muscle pains "at bay". Trigger point massage is often better tolerated by me (mental pain management) that some other tecniques on the really sensitive parts. My massage therapist is good at adapting to what works best for my pain tolerance and muscle release. For example, I mentioned to her the pain and fatigue challenges i had when trying the yoga stretching video, and she suggest she could also work in a bit of assisted stretching too for those muscles.
Massage therapists can adjust their pressure to your preferred and tolerable levels 😊. And a good massage therapist should be able to adapt which techniques to used too based on how your body responds and what it more tolerable for you. 😊.
Sometimes it can be a matter of finding the right experienced massage therapist. Its totally OK to book in just once to "test them out" and then decide whether or not you felt they were responsive to any feedback you gave (pressure, pain, etc) and also to discuss their own willingness/flexibility to try different techniques to see what works best for you. 😊
My person way of testing a massage therapists skills is to give a general history/idea yes, but see what they pick up on themselves just from the feel of the muscle without me saying if things hurt more/less in that specific point. 😉. Both my massage therapist and my chiro can feel my body and always pinpoint the spot that is most painful 🤣. And this is me facedown so they cant see if i wince or screw my face up in pain 🤣.
I can claim rebates from my private health insurance for the massage and chiro. I think i get about $26 back each visit, but i guess thats less of an issue for me because over the course of the year i will reach each of their funding caps anyway ($250 and $350 respectively).
However i dont get any rebate on my counsellor because she is not a psychologist.
I did hear though that some health funds are going to start giving rebates to counsellors with a Masters of counsellor. However mine "only" has a Grad Dip, so even if my fund did expand to allow counsellors rather than psychs it still wouldnt qualify for rebates.
I am yet to be presented with a good reason why health fund rebates shouldnt be allowed to be used to cover the *gap fee* for services. After all, its not like their rebates would cover the whole gap anyway! But it would definitely help with affordability for those who first use the 10 MHCP sessions but may not otherwise need to use non-MC-rebatable additional sessions up to the amount that would exhaust the service cap limit.
I don't think it would drive the price of those service fees higher.
I know there are currently legal rules around it preventing it. But i dont understand *why* those rules are in place when its not resulting in actual double-funding (i.e. a total rebate that pays more than the total fee charged).
Because my counsellor is not medicare-rebatable, it also does not count towards my medicare safety net 😭. I have already paid over $1k for counselling since Jan 1st. And none of it is recognised by medicare as an out of pocket medical expense. (But it also wouldnt be if it were with a psych after the first 10 sessions. However 10 sessions with a psych would cost $2k out of pocket).
Likewise my massage and chiro fees this year have also been a similar out of pocket expense each (just under $1k this year so far each) and not recognised at all by medicare towards the safety net.
If the 3 services were recognised by medicare, i would have hit the safety net during in less than 1 month 😭.
I guess with this new GP I will rack up my safety net quicker. Esp if/when i get appointments with the chronic health condition GP too! 😅
Sorry for the financial "rant". But it does feel good to be able to talk about it with people who "get it", even though we can't change it.