@Till23 its good to keep these conversations going. With us all being human and new people joining and people dropping out, it doesn’t hurt to keep best practice flexible and open and regularly renewed. I am hoping you feel more settled in time/tyme…or is that Rosemary and thyme?
Yes, I have been talking about these things on the forums for 10 years now @tyme @AuntGlow @Jynx before being “recovery focused” became an “thing”. Maybe I believe in the therapeutic potential and the importance of authenticity and vulnerability. Yes, differentiation of content among different threads can help create a broad tapestry of content for the community. I am very glad to see Sane has taken on board some of my ideas seriously, runs with it and keeps improving the formats. I know I am a bit old school, but psychoanalysis and social theory and psychodrama were foundational for me, even before I did counselling cert. The forums were a bit chaotic and unmoderated when I began and I worried about the consequences in people’s personal lives. I tried hard, keeping it inclusive and tend to be aware of statistical outliers, as often those who struggle with mental health issues are among the most marginalised, as I know, only too well.
I am probably good at masking too Till. But too much positivity may even alienate people from joining if it doesn’t feel genuine and relevant to their struggles. I guess peer work is more of an art than a science. Maybe that’s its strength. I don’t believe it would help our demographic to be too rigid about guidelines, though there are ways to manage it. I have seen really good and sensitive interventions by many people on the forum, paid and unpaid members alike. I have applied a couple times, with Sane, but never heard back, so now, I accept the benefits of being free to truly be me, and not sublimate my needs to earn money, which I had to do from a very young age.
yay @Shaz51