Hey @creative_writer just been reading along. This caught my attention:
@creative_writer wrote:
At the same time I’m having thoughts telling me I subconsciously enjoyed it. Can someone ever be responsible for SA?
I have heard that this is not an uncommon question that survivors ask themselves. Physiologically, there can be a seemingly positive body response to SA occurring, and it is sometimes used as 'evidence' by people who try to deny or diminish the impact, or justify the actions of the perpetrator. Those people are wrong. The only thing that matters is whether consent was freely and enthusiastically given (and that means not being coerced, convinced, or pushed into it; sometimes we will say yes to something we don't want because the alternative feels unsafe). We cannot control how our bodies respond to sensory input, and having some kind of 'positive' or 'pleasurable' response has nothing to do with whether or not it was SA; i.e. whether or not the act was morally wrong.
I've read that often these survivors can end up spiralling in shame because they question whether or not it really was SA, and I think it can be incredibly difficult to try to talk about this with others who may not understand, and who might try to gaslight the survivor into thinking that if they 'enjoyed' it, then their trauma is invalid.
Consent is what matters most. And the only person responsible for SA occurring is the perpetrator. Always.
If you wanna unpack it further or chat about it more, I'm always happy to listen hun. And if a distraction could help, and you don't wanna keep thinking on this and talking about it, I am always happy to do that too 💜