Heya @PeppiPatty ,
I'm no kind of lady!
In fact, I'm a bloke. 195cm, bearded, big-handed, deep-voiced, 100+ Kg (most of it fitness, too much of it not!)
So did I come across as female to you?
Actually, I'm not all that surprised. Since we're talking books, I did read a fascinating book a while back called Brain Sex ("Sex" as in gender) by Anne Moir and David Jessel, about the differences in the way male and female brains are organised (particularly in reference to the structure of the corpus callosum, the pituitary and the hypothalamus, but also in how and where data is processed). The premise is that the gender of the brain is not necessarily the same as the primary gender of the body that houses it, and the theory is that it is signally determined by the timing and quantity of floods of developmental hormones from the mother while the baby is in utero -- actually, co-inciding with a prominent theory about the development of sexual identity, though in both cases it admittedly doesn't tell the whole story. Anyway, there's a test included in the book (indicative, not prescriptive), and my results came out as quite markedly female.
It shows up in lots of ways. It's why I prefer Jung, Reich and Assagioli to Freud; why I prefer the Moon to the Sun and night hours to day; why I cheer for Neanderthals over Cro-Magnon (and am a huge fan of Stan Gooch's writings); why I prefer theatre to film and perception to action. I think it's also why I "smell wrong" to a lot of people, why I get brutalised often, and why I'm gay.
You are right about being ignorant. but, people with MI sometimes forget how to feel kind to others because of the overwhelming feeling of stress not just from other people but....feeling like they don't fit.
Yes, I think that's true. But I also think the dialogue is almost always skewed in other people's response to MI people. To borrow a comment from a documentary I recently watched that concerned people with MI, once you let people know about your diagnosis, it's almost impossibl to be seen as a person ever again. In the terms of Transactional Analysis, The Others habitually adopt a Parent position and try to force us into the Child response. In my experience, they get quite indignant if you don't allow yourself to be Parented, and often that includes their trying to make decisions and evaluations on our behalf. It's the Dark Parent role that a lot of people assume, belittling and controlling the MI Child. But they tend to forget two things: firstly, that we need to feel present as real people, not just a demonstration of The Others' (ego-driven) Generosity and Tolerance; and secondly, that we ourselves are also making allowances for their foibles and stumbles on the path. I've encountered many people who behave as if they are totally without flaws when they forcibly assume the driver's seat in someone else's life, and seem to expect the person they're now "helping" to be contrite and completely "I-though-so-unworthy".
I had an utterly horrendous experience a few years back when my local Mental Health mob packed me off to a CBT course (without any say or consultation) that began with the leader actually saying "we're going to teach you techniques that, if you practise them very hard, will one day make you normal like me". And it went downhill from there. The only thing I found useful about the course was the experience of watching that sociopath in action, and the light-switching-on of realising how emblematic he was of so many people in the "helping" professions, who are either in denial or else totally non-cognizant of their own flaws, but actually get paid to flail around inflicting further damage on largely defenceless people who have come to them for aid and support. The fact that it's institutionaly demanded of us that we assume the energetic position of the prostrate supplicant before the conversation can even commence is totally outrageous, and I would even say pathological. To me, it's the canker in the fragrant rose of the helping industry.
Haha! I'm all cranky-pants now! 😉