@EternalFlower wrote:
Hi @Paperdaisy agree many people find psychologists helpful.
I think therapy is a broad term and people can also get benefit from seeing social workers, peer workers, ots or mh nurses which can all have therapeutic effect if its the right fit.
The problem I have with that, though, is that it makes things so confusing for the average joe, who can't make hide nor hair of all these wacky job titles.
I remember when I was first looking in to therapy, I visited several major mental health websites with information pages about the differant types of therapists that were common back then. TBH, I think these info pages were all just copy-pasted from one website to another.
What used to drive me bonkers were their explainations for "psychologists" and "councillors". Their explaination for "psychologist" was something like:
"Psychologists will talk to you about your problems and perform therapy..."
and the explaination for "councillor" was like:
"Councillors use 'talk therapy' to resolve your problems..."
I used to reread these things over and over and over again, trying to spot the differance, which ultimately I could never do. Because it was the exact same message, just reworded. To this day, I still have no idea what the heck the differance is between them. Only differance I'm aware of is in the sizes of the bills.
I just can't see the sense or reason in making the system so damned convoluted and confusing, by deviding it up with so many differant job titles, but then neglecting to offer any meaningful clarity for the average patient, as to what each one of those jobs supposedly does.
And I think one of the key divisions we need to explicitly highlight is therapists who adhere to "The Golden Rule of Therapy" (i.e. to not offer any real-world assistance or clear advice), vs. those who do not. Because a lot of patients can immediately rule out all the therapists on one side of that line, because they definitely need someone from the other side.