Not Coping

Can you try taking deep breaths, or can you talk to your wife @ArraDreaming

Punch a pillow?

Go for a run?

If you want I am okay for you to say what you want to say even if it is angry.

I can take it. @ArraDreaming

Nice @Birdofparadise8 , I like it.. I just have a question, if that’s ok? 🙂

If you are using a comparison, it’s best to speak of it in the hypothesis… the data you kindly shared earlier shows two different data sets from two different areas on the body - however, your hypothesis only speaks of the Ha (alternate hypothesis - what you’re trying to prove exists), whereas to prove this, often a person needs to compare this to something. That something should be stated in the hypothesis. Does that make sense? 🌺🙂

thank you - berry pastry was so yum 😋

Just chilling and watching movies. Was going to do some study but I feel a bit tired.. I’m really enjoying chatting here with you though - exercising my brain cells with chatting about your project 🙂

I hope you don’t mind! 🌺

Ok what about punching the pillow @ArraDreaming

That can help.

Here is my title for the report

Investigating Tactile Acuity and Cortical Representation: Through Cutaneous Receptor and Two-Point Discrimination Across Peripheral Body Regions.

We looked at multiple body areas. @Former-Member

What is Ha? Is it to do with the different variables as well? The IP and DP

IV – Body region DV two-point discrimination and localisation of touch.

Ah, I totally get it now: multiple data sets mean you aren’t using Ha (alternate hypothesis) method 🙌🏻🙂

your hypothesis can reflect more about comparisons across body regions, if you’d like it to?

Ha isn’t directly tied to IV & DV, because it looks at null comparisons (null hypothesis or Ho). So, please feel free to disregard my suggestion because I assumed there was only a two-point comparison 🤭🌺🙂

So is my hypothesis from before okay @Former-Member

I'm so confused.

We hypothesise that higher tactile acuity, particularly the higher density of mechanoreceptors and larger cortical representation through the comparison of peripheral body regions, is linked with finer two-point discrimination and lower localisation of error.

Is that better? @Former-Member