TY for the tag @Appleblossom 😊
That pdf is BRILLIANT, thank you for that - I will comb over the full thing later but what I did see already gave me a wry chuckle so I look forward to reading the rest! Reminds me a little of 'allistics as described by autistic folks', I can't find it now but it was like, 'makes way too much eye contact, sits eerily still, doesn't say things how they're meant but relies on subtext' etc 😂
Hi @Owlunar2 haven't chatted to you in forever!! How have you been going?
I totally agree too, about the power imbalances that can emerge in clinical note-taking. That's so crappy @EternalFlower especially when you're struggling with ED!
I do totally remember learning about 'case conceptualisation' at uni, and like I kinda get it, but mostly it brings me back to this same conclusion I keep finding myself at - humans are too complex for categorisation. And what is diagnosis but a kind of categorising?
If diagnosis was used JUST as a guide for understanding and treatment, like it's supposed to be, then maybe it wouldn't be so bad. But stigma and our current social context means that it can also be like getting slapped with a brand that then turns society's opinions of you into something entirely different. Not to mention the systemic barriers folks may suddenly find themself facing.
Anyway I'll stop my ranting there before I get all cranky and worked up but yeah it's intense how someone can write a letter about you (i.e. clinical notes) based on one interaction, and your whole life can change. I wish more folks took the approach you described @EternalFlower where it's that vibe of 'nothing about you without you.'