@Appleblossom Ha great you enjoyed. Also like how your heritage is Dutch, and you even know the language! Harstikke leuk om die taal te zien zo ver van huis!😁
Yes i agree the drone bit was a little bit shaky, as was his God experience lacking when it came to his perspective of the 'holiness' of the Godhead, only describing His loving side and not combining properly with God's Eternal Truth. So i thought he was still a bit out of touch with God's TRUE/FULL reality. (Far too much dark matter in his analysis here. Just like our universe is also mainly formed/shaped by what is not tangible, visible or understood, and drives everything apart, so humanities consciousness is also devoid of the real thing letting light through yet uneffected by The Light, and full of black holes, and chock-a-block full of worm holes when it comes to that 😂)
Also our Lord Jesus, the truth of The Truth's crucifixion holding all of our reality together, was not to be found in his understand of the Quantum Field. Neither do i adhere to limited binary 1, 0, randomness understanding of The Field, for Paul tells us God answers us always YES in Christ. Which i thought was a real pity. (In this part of his analysis you can see how he failed combining God's love (The Cross) with God's truth (Our Heavenly Father, The Quantum Field, shaping all reality.))
i did like his understanding of 'death' though, and i thought we could lay that basically next to Scriptures like Revelation 3:21, or Revelation 21 for that matter. (Seeing you like the symbolism of Scripture, i understand The New Jerusalem coming down from Heaven to be my mind renewed in Christ. (Believers receiving The Mind of God in The Spirit, as Paul talks about 1 Cor 2:12-16) )
Still i was very excited when i heard of it for the first time. Especially how he basically kicked classical panpsychism out of the door focussing on the quantum field instead. (i reckon God tells us the same in Isaiah 55:8-9,) For in my understanding a classical understanding of wave function collapse held on far to much to flesh/matter in its analysis. (The same restriction he saw AI development as having) So he was right on about that.
So true him saying we created maths, rather than 'maths' created our reality. Just like physics, in my opinion, has been so guilty of doing, having physicist like Dawkins writing books about the mind of God, ironically devoid of God's Mind, stuck 'numbering everything the maths idol he was serving', (seeing 666 everywhere) so i loved hearing him do that.😍
So i glad you liked it. And hope more good science will becoming from this train of thought developing in science today. For such is LONG overdue.
(Oh now i got to know you a little better dear sister in Christ. i would like to ask this. Would it help you understanding that when i use the word spirituality in my chats, i either talk about God's Divine Consciousness, or our carnal consciousness, and that i read/understand The Word of God as such? For in no way do i adhere to the religiously witch-crafty hokkus pocus spirituality or carnal reading the Word of God has often has become down here. For it hurt you, me, and us all so very badly.
For i hate religion (Revelation 17:15) taking the concepts of our faith as God had them written, (Revelation 22:18-19) that is why i like using the traditional (religious) wording to describe my ideas in a New Way. As Jesus did for me getting to know Him through The Word, me meeting Him in His Divine Consciousness reading it. (For hopefully then you wont feel bible bashed any longer me using God's Word to make my point clear. For The Living Word is what we need to get the YES from The Divine Consciousness shaping and giving life to all reality. The Great YWHA we meet in, and with Jesus in S(s)pirit.))
Have a blessed day growing in God's truth and love.
(Sorry not supporting your chats the button is on the blink again. @Realness @ENKELI @heartathome @holdinghope5 )