@Invi thank you so much. I understand the existential angst. It's one of the reasons I need to be alone. If I'm around people too much and emot as one should (we regulate our emotions by expressing them to the people we talk to, our friends and family, so when we "rant" we are just regulating our emotions, known as emoting) it becomes existential to them at some point and they start to drift away.
The thing that gave me the traction to move was a book by Albert Camus "The myth of Sisyphus"
In Greek mythology, Sisyphus was the cunning, deceitful king of Ephyra (Corinth) who was eternally punished in the underworld for his hubris and attempts to trick the gods. His punishment involved rolling a massive boulder up a hill, only for it to roll back down, for eternity, representing futile, never-ending labor.
In the book Camus explores this myth and what it says about our existence. He goes onto suggests how we are able to go on in such circumstances.
Spoiler alert - What I took out of it was this... Sisyphus was able to accept his fate and even FIND MEANING in his existence by shrinking his world down to the smallest details he could. From the outside it looked like repeated drudgery and effort for no reason but internally for Sisyphus it was not like this. At the bottom of the hill, he would start his journey up, pushing the boulder as he went.
Everytime he placed his right hand on the boulder he would feel the grooves and raises and the pits in the uneven surface. And then he would do the same with his left hand and only when he had explored the texture under his hands would he push.
He would then step with his left foot and feel the mountain give just a little and he would explore how it moved under him on the step. Then he would move his right foot and do the same.
Everytime he touched that boulder he could "feel" the difference in it from the last time he had touched it. Every step he took, the earth beneath him moved slightly different.
When he reached the top and the boulder rolled down again, he would enjoy the little break as he walked down to meet the boulder and start again.
In this way Camus reframed Sisyphus as a hero who, in facing his meaningless, eternal task with awareness, ultimately triumphs over his circumstances.
As for the unanswerable questions of the universe, you are correct, you can not rationalise your way out of them. For my mind that is because the solution is often found in a paradox.
It can be uncomfortable to hold two diametrically opposed ideas in ones head. For example, if someone asks me if I'm happy. I can honestly say yes, I'm safe, I have shelter, I have food and, I have my dog. At the same time if they asked me if I'm sad. I can honestly say yes, there is war and starvation and not everyone gets to have a dog. It takes some practise but once you can hold two opposite ideas in the same space it is much easier to walk the middle path. And, the middle path is where the "good life" can be found.
I really enjoy these types of conversations and as a truth seeker I have had no choice but to clear these hurdles to progress further on my journey. I want to talk about it because it helps me internalise it further when I try to explain it.
So, please help me by sharing your thoughts. The community standards are there to protect people from harm. We are doing the opposite and I'm happy to mention @Nala2022 for their advice on how to proceed. Perhaps some type of warning at the top of a comment "The following comment contains detailed analysis of existential ideas
To keep such important conversations in the dark is only exacerbating the issue adding to the sense of isolation and loneliness.
I hope you managed a little bit of rest last night