@tyme thank you. According to mainstream psychiatry, psychosis is only caused by biological factors and not social or psychological factors. However, if you look at the bio-psycho-social model, it does suggest that psychological and social stressors can also contribute to psychosis. I think psychiatry needs to move more into this direction.
I can see a clear pattern with my own mental health of conflict causing psychosis. I also have a parent who has a psychotic disorder who also seems to be triggered by conflict. Neither of us has found a psychiatrist who has been able to give a biological based explanation of why we fluctuate with our mental illnesses the way that we do.
An issue with conflict is that trying too hard to avoid conflict actually ends up leading to more conflict. I used to be very people pleasing in order to prevent conflict (and hence keep my mental health stable). However, being too people pleasing attracts toxic people and I've learnt there are people who will inevitably become exploitative and abusive if I treat them with unconditional niceness. There are some situations in which conflict is essential in order to prevent worse conflict in the future.
Do you think that could be related to why Sane promote moving towards conflict?
I can see that for other people there are lots of opportunities to learn and grow through conflict. However, for me, I don't learn from social mistakes the way other people seem to. I don't seem to be able to distinguish the difference between a conflict and a serious threat. For my own safety, it is essential for me to isolate myself from others when I'm showing warning signs of building up to psychosis. It is a very lonely and frustrating thing, but no amount of medication and therapy offers me the protection that a temporary period of social isolation does.