Very interesting points you raise @Glisten
I too am interested in the Federal (and states) Budgets in regard to mental health, and have been active in my state's Mental Health Commission, but I have a different point of view on some things.
This might not go down well with some people here, but I don't think the answer is just for the government to throw more money at mental health professionals. Why? It avoids addressing the tough issues.
Take housing, for example. You're worried about your housing situation, or dont have a home? Of course you're going to be depressed and/or develop other MH issues. But the government(s) will not admit there is a link between housing, or lack thereof, and mental health because it would be an admission that their policies are causing harm.
'Mental Health' is a dynamic phrase. To me, it imparts a lot of responsibility on the individual. You have poor cardiac health? That's your fault for not exercising and eating well. You have bad dental health? That's your fault for not brushing and flossing everyday. You have bad mental health? That's your fault for not practicing mindfulness, gratefulness, and meditation.
We need to get the government to take responsibility for factors that cause bad mental health, not just through money at professionals. Someone who doesn't know where they're going to sleep tonight will be depressed and anxious, regardless of how many psychologist and psychiatrist appointments they attend.
I'm not saying that government policy is 100% responsible for poor mental health, but, hey, they put 5 star nutrition ratings on food didn't they? And banned leaded petrol. And asbestos. And put a lot of restrictions on smoking.
Also, I'm using homelessness and housing as examples here, but I think the government's responsibility to protect peoples (mental) health should extend to other areas, including, but not limited to:
* Domestic violence (including psychological abuse)
* Loneliness
* Wage stagnation
* Cost of living
* Decline in communities
* Access to education
* Social media
These are all big, expensive, difficult, and disruptive problems. So what does the government do? Go for the low hanging fruit by simply throwing more money at MH professionals (who will probably just adjust their prices to envelope this anyway). They'll carry on about how they've committed $X million dollars to MH and score points that way. But, really, how long have the past state and federal governments been doing that for? 10? 15? 20 years? I haven't noticed any major improvements in the general publics MH, have you?
To use a poor analogy, it's like the government is funding more money into asthma medication, rather than looking at closing down the factory that's belching smoke into the air next door.