@Minnie64
When I was 18-20 I rode under the influence of many substances. Legality was not the question for me, as most people seemed negative, angry and corrupt. Now I am amazed I got home in one piece. For a while I thought it was God looking out for me. Now I think it was probably partly due to early abandonment and me being very used to dissociating, so I could compartmentalise in my brain. A weird kind of resilience. I never took to alcohol, probably as I saw many angry drunks on the street, and I never wanted to be like that, so in a weird way I turned it around to healthy living, by time I returned from overseas, I was at uni, 23, all I could afford was a push bike and legumes, and I was alright with that, as I had seen the world and was at a top uni, seemed a fair trade off. I was also the driver and carer when others were in psychotic states. I only had one psychotic break when I was 17, but had a practical mindset and too often there were younger people around who needed caring.
Now I firmly believe big pharma peddling pills is more culpable than any acts I did back then. I had been raised on an excess of religion and little awareness of legality anyway. Good medicine and wise use of meds is important, but making medicine a profitmaking industry .. idk
@Bunniekins
From what I researched, the whole legal question of insanity in legal jurisdictions circles around culpability and guilt, and then deciding punishment. "Criminal insanity" per se seems more of a journalist phrase than a legal one, to inspire horror in a good law abiding public (some facetiousness there) and increases stigma regarding Mental illness ... IMO.
@eth
