LemonjuiceSenior Contributor
What to do, offensive uni material.
Hi everyone,
I'm not sure what to do about this and could use advice.
I'm doing a uni course in psychology. One of my subjects is abnormal psych. The first lecture was about what is and isn't abnormal. They botched it because they don't really justfy or answer the question, but ok, but then the lecturer goes on to state that psychodynamic therapy 'should be avoided'. They cherrypick a single article that shows some problems with psychodynamic therapies, but don't go into comparative success rates, etc. They seem to confuse psychodynamic with psychoanalysis of Freud's time. The call CBT as 'the gold standard'. It's pretty obvious that they are ignorant on the subject and biased towards CBT, which, ok, I can live with the bias but how dare they suggest that psychodynamic therapy which I am doing and is helping, should be avoided. They basically are implying my treatment choice is a farce, my therapist a charlatan and I'm a pigeon. I feel hurt and insulted. If they had framed it in a positive way, ie, 'we have a preference for CBT in this course since it complies with scientific method' and not scare people about using other treatment forms, I would be ok with that.
So, should I just shut up and let it pass? Maybe I am making to much about this, being too overly sensitive. Then I thought about writing to the lecturer and just ask them if she is suggesting that I ought to leave my treatment. It would put her on the spot and force her to rethink how she phrases things.