So, hitching a ride on @BlueBay's point, before we start I think it’s important to note that PTG can be a challenging concept. At first glance, it might seem to be seeking to minimise genuine experiences of suffering. To help clear this up, here are a few things that post-traumatic growth isn’t:
- A denial of the impact of traumatic events. PTG happens IN ADDITION to expected trauma reactions not as an alternative to them.
- The same thing as resilience. PTG is not about a return to some version of your previous level of health or functioning but to growth beyond that.
- The opposite of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Survivors can, and do, experience both. In fact some studies indicate that ‘intermediate’ levels of PTSD are associated with the highest level of post-traumatic growth. One does not rule out the other.
- A reflection of superiority in some way. We still don’t fully understand the circumstances in which PTG occurs. It is slowly being unravelled but we know that factors like genetics and the availability of good support, are likely to be connected. These are beyond, or only partially within, our control. So there’s never any room for judgement, towards ourselves or others, about who does or doesn’t experience PTG.
- Wishful thinking on behalf of mental health professionals and academics. The studies are mostly based on self-reports which means that the survivors themselves report these changes. There’s probably room for argument about bias in phrasing the questions or interpreting the results but the weight of evidence is sitting pretty firmly on the side of PTG at this point.