Phoenix_RisingSenior Contributor
BPD and complex PTSD
Hi all,
Ok, I'm going to start by saying this is a venting rant, so feel free to stop reading now.
I am really struggling with the trend lately in psychology/psychiatry of labelling people with both BPD and complex PTSD. The diagnostic criteria for these two labels is so similar that I would suggest pretty much everyone who meets the criteria for one, will also meet the criteria for the other. So what is the point of giving someone two labels when one would suffice?
Can anyone explain to me how one would do a differential diagnosis between BPD and complex PTSD? Can anyone explain to me how, in the one person, you could say these symptoms are due to BPD and these ones are due to complex PTSD. If they can't be seperated out, WHY HAVE TWO LABELS???? How does having two labels instead of one guide treatment? How does it help the client gain greater understanding of their struggles? I would suggest that coming out of a psych's office with two labels would suggest to the client that there is double the problem than if you came out with one, which surely must have a negative impact on the client.
I know there was a strong push to re-name BPD complex-PTSD in the DSM-V but the idea was rejected. I think this was a mistake. To say that someone's personality is disordered is to infer there is something fundamentally wrong with them, whereas the label of complex-PTSD infers that the issue is a response to something that has happened to the person. Thus I much prefer the term complex-PTSD to BPD. However, trying to say that someone has BOTH BPD and complex-PTSD is, to me, absurd.
If anyone can shed light on this for me, I would greatly appreciate it.
@Former-Member @Former-Member @Former-Member @Former-Member