This is an interesting take, and a good bit of food for thought. While I agree that social media has fuelled an uptick in certain mental health diagnoses, I see it in a more positive light because it’s reducing the stigma of these conditions. I don’t think there are more people living with these conditions than before; I think more people are able to access information that gives more clarity to issues that they may have previously dismissed as just how hard life is without needing a label or reason. While self-diagnosis can be potentially limiting or problematic, these are people who arguably have legitimate and often long term mental health concerns that have been unable to find reasons for the issues they’ve faced in their lifetimes. If they’re resonating with specific language and wording used by people on social media, isn’t it possible that they have actually experienced things the author deems ‘worthy’ of that diagnosis? Another person’s path isn’t mine to judge.
A diagnosis, self or clinical, is only as limiting as we choose to let it be, and it only becomes the crux of our personality and how we interact with the world if we decide it is.
As someone with a formal medical diagnosis, I can attest to how expensive getting help is, and I didn’t seek it, I had it thrust upon me. I wouldn’t be around now today without it - hell I’m barely here now with it. Cost shouldn’t be a barrier to a formal diagnosis and ongoing help, but it really is.
Just because this phenomena is driven by social media, doesn’t mean it’s all for clout. I know that the fear is that by popularising conditions in the media, people lower the bar of ‘entry’ into that condition to reshape their lives and alter the narratives they’ve already lived to suit. My hope is that maybe this is giving people access to tools and a different form of help than we’d like, but one that makes things a little easier.
I just feel like the author presupposes that those with a self-diagnosis would not actually meet with a similar clinical diagnosis and it feels closed-minded. Maybe it’s the very label of ‘self-diagnosed’ that needs changing to something like ‘undiagnosed’ or ‘suspected’ that’s less invalidating to the actual process other people have had to endure with their diagnosis. We live in a country of ‘she’ll be right’. I’d rather hear someone admit ‘I’m pretty sure I have xyz condition’ than someone never learn that help can come in many forms.
I dunno. Feel free to completely disagree!