RickSenior Contributor
The affectiveness of teatment for mental illness........
I would like to pose a question to the forum.
I feel this is a topic which we talk about often on this forum and we all have feelings about but which the mental health sector both clinical and non clinical themselves appear to not be aware of. On a sector forum that I take part in a practicing clinician made the statement that in the USA peer support programs were completely inaffective and that mental health should be left to professional clinicians. I personally argued the point that it was my experience and the experience of people I know well that the clinical side of MH treatment was full of gaps. These gaps being the actual affectiveness of medications and treament therapies.
So what do you think? If you are recieving treatment for your illness is that treatment actually working in regard to the symptoms of your illness.
How affective is the treatment you recieve for your mental illness?
Are the medications you are on completely affective, partially affective or not affective?
Is the counselling, therapy, analysis and service support you recieve affective or not affective?
How do you deal with any gaps in treatment affectiveness?
I would like very much to thank everyone who participates in this discussion, as I believe the more I know objectively the better my ability to advocate.................
Thankyou
Rick