@Zoe7 wrote:
..one size does not fit all...
Believe me, I know. 😉 Makes it so inconvienient for the bosses, doesn't it? So inconvienient for those of us on the conveyor belt, too.
I'm reminded of this one lesson we had once - I think it was in 1st grade. The teacher was teaching us how to draw floorplans. She talked us all through a floorplan of the classroom she'd drawn on the blackboard as an example, and then the exercise was for us to draw floorplans of our own bedrooms.
Most of us were fine to work on our own, but there was this one girl in the class who simply didn't get the concept at all. The teacher spent the whole lesson squatting over this girl's shoulder - I think that the teacher ended up basically drawing most of the floorplan herself. And then the teacher had to constantly question another girl in the class - a friend of the 'slow' girl, who had visited the 'slow' girl's house many times - to clarify the layout of the girl's bedroom. So this second girl would've been constantly distracted from her work and probably finished a little behind, as well.
That worked out all well and good when there was only one girl in the class who needed all that special attention. But the teacher was working flat-out for the duration. What would've happened if there'd been 4 or 5 kids in the class who needed that level of special assistance? The lesson would've taken 4 or 5 times as long; and more likely then not, the other 25 kids would've been finished very quickly and spent the majority of the lesson just sitting around goofing off.
Of course, in the real world, in situations like this, it's normally the case the the 'slow' kids are just left to fall behind, rather then the majority of the class waiting for them to catch up.