No doubt you will appreciate how the ancient cosmic organism I mentioned above would have had plans for me when I first encountered it that fateful evening in North Sydney. Let me tell you now about a being who has waited a long time for us to arrive at this point in our evolutionary history.
About three weeks after the evening in question I moved into a rambling old private hotel by the harbour in Neutral Bay where I got a tiny room with a harbour view for just $28 a week. I had enough left over for food and a small amount of cannabis. The food I ate at the required times but it was three weeks before I could muster the courage to dip into the deep tranquil waters of a solitary puff.
On the day that I dared to enquire after this mysterious being I rolled the first joint at about 10 am and smoked probably half of it before I sat back against the wall silently anticipating a now forlorn confrontation with my distilled reflection. I tried to dismiss from my mind the chatter of trivial thoughts in anticipation of a sign of some sort. I had limited success in this regard because it wasn't long before I was thinking of a time many months earlier when I read Wu Cheng'en's classic comic novel The Monkey King, about a cheeky monkey who accompanied Tripitaka on his long journey west to fetch the sacred Buddhist texts.
I mentally traced the monkey's journey from Aolai, which I mistakenly assumed was Hawaii when I read the story, across China to India, and I began to compare the isolation of his island home with the solitude of Buddha and, in view of my Christian upbringing, with the unique experience of Jesus in first century Palestine. It was at this point that I conceived of each character as representing a chakra, echoing the Buddhist theme structuring the story, and I was then overcome by an image of the Earth as a planetary being in possession of such psychic nodes, or chakras such as the belly, the heart and the throat.
I was somewhat startled by this and my senses were quickly aroused. The image was left dangling in my mind while I mentally scoured a map of the world in search of topographical features which would either confirm or disprove a theory now assembling beyond my control. I looked at the North American continent and decided that it looked distinctly pelvic. I could ask myself somewhat facetiously, "Well, if the North American continent represents the pelvic region of a planetary being then where is the rest of it?" The North and South American continents I thought could resemble the hind legs of the planetary being. I looked at Africa and saw the possible appearance of planetary forelegs, and in view of the often dominant nature of European culture I had to conclude that Europe could be the capital of this planet.
My mind was racing with a vision of the Earth as an integral planetary being, but I made little further progress with this theory on the day that I conceived of it, and it was many years later that I was able to assemble all the confirmatory bits of observation, some of which I present to you as follows.
I'll begin with Australia, not because it is my homeland as it is yours as well most likely, but because it is the foundation on which we may understand a feature of European topography.
It is our humble service as Australians to represent the planetary foetus. If you turn your map of Australia upside down then you may see how the head of the planetary foetus is located in the vicinity of Tasmania, and how the tail of the foetal representation can be seen in the vicinity of Australia's western shores. In this case the foetal legs extend north to the equator where Australia is joined to the planetary mother by an umbilicus the Indonesian archipelago.
It is this crucial bit of topographical evidence which allows us to interpret the head of the planetary being because, in Ireland and the island of Great Britain, we see a diminution of the global representation in its entirety. In this case Ireland corresponds with Australia in so far as it depicts a child whose parent is the island of Great Britain. The legs of Ireland can be seen extending from its western shores while its head can be seen to coincide with the political boundary drawn around Northern Ireland.
The island of Great Britain itself depicts a diminution of the northern features of planet Earth. Scotland represents the head of the planetary diminution, its forearms can be seen extending west of Scotland's Southern Uplands and its legs can be seen east of Land's End in the south of England.
There are countless other features of global topography which are worth mentioning but I'll leave it up to you to discover these on your own. I will, however, mention two of them, one of which is of such a disturbing nature that I feel obliged to draw it to your attention promptly. If it is reasonable to propose that planetary topography is ultimately representational, and that representations are symbolic, then the coastal outline drawn around Italy presents us with a sobering representation indeed. The threatening tension between the Italian peninsula and the island of Sicily is unmistakable and unavoidably involves the Catholic Church and the crime families of Sicily in a conflict between good and evil on a grand cosmic scale.
The other feature I will point out to you is as fascinating as it is dramatic. If the North American continent depicts the pelvic region of planet Earth then we may expect to find in this vicinity a depiction of sexual fertility. In this case the Antilles archipelago can be seen to represent a fully motile male gamete while the Gulf of Mexico depicts an ovum and is fascinating because together they depict the very instant of conception. It is likely that the planetary organism has been storing representations of its experience since the dawn of creation in this vicinity.
Now, this is a startling observation whose implications scatter in every direction like a tumbler dropped from several metres onto smooth concrete flooring, so I expect you'll want to apply a measured circumspection. As it happens I've done a bit of polling over years which suggests that there is a modest belief in its validity. All the bits of observable data fit together too neatly to be a coincidence, is what this group of readers will say. But, by the same token, there is a substantial group who refuse to acknowledge its validity, they refuse to believe that stone and dirt could ever resemble flesh and blood which, they will say, is just too unlikely.
I'm content to propose on this occasion that the split between the two groups is 50:50 because it renders a proposition, which may be potentially alarming to some forum members, in terms which are more readily manageable. I doubt that my thinking will be of undue concern to either members of this forum, or the administrators who are charged with their protection.
Nevertheless, it is a formidable proposition whose relevance to sufferers of mental illness is borne out by its implications. Its implications lead directly to a theory of mind, of consciousness, and of the multitude of voices united in a single unified being.