Fredd50Senior Contributor
The isolation of "hegemony"
I just feel like I have to post something about this.
I've recently come across a new word "hegemony".
It's a bit of a nerdy word that means, according to the oxford online:
"Leadership or dominance, especially by one state or social group over others"
For me this word, hegemony, describes the medical model - it's language, it's systems, it's cruel dominance over any form or expression of vulnerability, trauma and pain. It's tendency, for those who oppose it, to use violence and force to break spirits until they submit to its reign.
It's the way that even here, I feel scared to speak out about how I feel about this model, about the abuse with which it has been forced on me, about how even after 20 years and a lot of research to be able to back myself up when I say I oppose psychiatry, there are still those who have the power to simply ignore anything I say, and force their views on me.
There are still those who even boldly write down in my notes that, having gone to them for help ad understanding that I have "no insight" into my condition on because of "entrenched anti-psychiatry views" or because I said i felt "mental health is too complex for psychiatry to understand".
But, isn't it?
Does it really make sense when a vulnerable human comes seeking shelter and understanding from trauma or emotional distress, that they should be locked up, treated as a prisoner, forced to take drugs and judged humiliatingly on the way that their distress is "presenting"?
Should a psychiatrist who has never met this person before be able to have the right - because they don't understand the way this person is expressing themselves to say that the support and therapy they have been receiving is "undertreatment" because someone like that clearly needs to be drugged out of their wits, not understood. And to enforce that - just because that was the way they were trained to look at people?
And fairly, should organisations like this one be allowed to keep perpetuating that hegemony - that silencing of any other way of understanding one's distress by continuing to put forward those categorisations as if they are fact - to "reify them".
Trauma and distress, in all their forms are very real. But "mental illness" isn't a model that works for everyone. Will there ever be safe places to go where people are allowed to choose, whether or not they want to see their experiences as an "illness".
I came to this forum as a safe place. But it scares me. Because I'm afraid that I might inadvertently cause offense by saying: Please, suffering is real but "mental illnesess" is a concept - only one way of looking at human suffering, and a way that many people feel has damaged them a lot to be forced to take on, even if others have found it helpful.
But it's hurting me not to be able to say it. So i'm saying it now to be brave.
I hope that's ok.
I have been abused. I have been forced. I have been dominated.
These have been my real experiences, and none of them have improved my mental health.
But by others, I have been welcomed, I have been heard, I have been understood and I have been empowered.
I dearly hope this post won't get deleted. I understand a lot of people are comfortable with the term "mental illness" and I respect that.
But unfortunately, I have had very different experiences. And I"m hoping this will be a safe space to speak out about what I have been through too.