chibamSenior Contributor
Is This A Step Backwards For Lived Experiance Voices?
A couple days ago, I posted about the recently released report about the harms done by the Victorian Mental Health system. (https://www.livedexperiencejustice.au/s/Not-Before-Time-State-Acknowledgement-of-Harm-2023-FINAL-RELEASE-compressed.pdf, for any who are interested.)
Further research has led me to discover that, apparently, the Victorian government actually tried to suppress or water down this report before it's release the other day.
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=mental+health+report+%22tried+to+gag%22&cr=countryAU&tbs=ctr:countryAU,qdr:w&source=lnt&sa=X&biw=1536&bih=741&dpr=1.25
https://web.archive.org/web/20230615193923/https://www.thechronicle.com.au/news/victoria/page/2?nk=0d6544d76870da5d3f73e1ef0745358f-1686857963
The report's authors apparently pushed ahead with it's publication, against the wishes of the government, and apparently many officials are livid that it's actually gone public.
Unfortunately, I know only as much as I can glean from the leading blurbs about the news articles discussing this situation, as the articles themselves are behind a paywall and I've been unable to read them.
It's easy to considder this a big win. "The small underdog advocate for the victims of the system evades the big, bad government and the might old guard of the mental health system, to the get the victims' message out to the mainstream media. David conquers Goliath at last." But I can't help but worry that that might be a shortsighted view of what's just happened.
Supposedly, before releasing this report, the lead author was firmly warned by the powers-that-be that if he published this report without making the alterations they wanted, he would never be aloud to consult on any government mental health project again. That, in itself, is tragic. But I worry that the impacts may spread further then this one whistleblower-turned-sacrificial-lamb.
Will this episode change the government's view of lived experiance people? Now that they've seen we can be volatile, uncontrollable, and prone to using public platforms to announce things they don't want to hear, will they quietly try to weaken the various lived experiance roles in policy formation, that have been promised to us over the last few years? To gradually sweep our voices into the background again? Or will it lead to them deliberately packing their "lived experiance" committees with "company men", who may have some degree of lived experiance, but who are moreso defined by their willingness to parrot the exact same attitudes that the government "encourages" them to promote, rather then expressing what the community is genuinely saying? We all know that that sort of thing has happened before.
I can't help but worry that we're yet to see the full pricetag for what's happened this week. I suspect the cost will be heavier then any of us were prepared for.
Tagging you, @Historylover , because you were interested in that other thread.